March 1, 2022 Primary Election
Tuesday, March 1, 2022
DEM Commissioner of Agriculture (DEM)
Precinct-by-Precinct Results
Total Votes Cast: 24,335
Final Official Election Results
![Red Bar](images/red_hr.png)
Jump to Precinct:
|
View another Contest:
|
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 17.29 % | 23 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.71 % | 110 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 9 Total Votes: 133
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 19.30 % | 55 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.70 % | 230 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 25 Total Votes: 285
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 14.56 % | 53 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 85.44 % | 311 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 41 Total Votes: 364
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 22.78 % | 59 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 77.22 % | 200 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 15 Total Votes: 259
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 21.21 % | 7 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 78.79 % | 26 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 4 Total Votes: 33
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 19.02 % | 39 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.98 % | 166 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 24 Total Votes: 205
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 13.51 % | 25 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 86.49 % | 160 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 17 Total Votes: 185
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 0.00 % | 0 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 100.00 % | 4 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 0 Total Votes: 4
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 20.00 % | 10 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.00 % | 40 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 5 Total Votes: 50
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 21.96 % | 47 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 78.04 % | 167 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 25 Total Votes: 214
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 27.08 % | 13 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 72.92 % | 35 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 4 Total Votes: 48
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 18.18 % | 10 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 81.82 % | 45 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 3 Total Votes: 55
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 16.55 % | 24 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 83.45 % | 121 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 13 Total Votes: 145
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 17.38 % | 85 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.62 % | 404 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 43 Total Votes: 489
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 13.74 % | 54 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 86.26 % | 339 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 38 Total Votes: 393
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 16.07 % | 27 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 83.93 % | 141 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 13 Total Votes: 168
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 15.59 % | 46 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 84.41 % | 249 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 15 Total Votes: 295
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 17.15 % | 83 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.85 % | 401 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 45 Total Votes: 484
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 19.91 % | 42 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.09 % | 169 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 20 Total Votes: 211
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 15.26 % | 74 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 84.74 % | 411 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 35 Total Votes: 485
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 17.88 % | 32 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.12 % | 147 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 9 Total Votes: 179
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 17.95 % | 7 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.05 % | 32 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 1 Total Votes: 39
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 22.22 % | 26 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 77.78 % | 91 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 11 Total Votes: 117
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 17.20 % | 32 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.80 % | 154 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 18 Total Votes: 186
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 18.82 % | 48 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 81.18 % | 207 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 13 Total Votes: 255
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 20.89 % | 61 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 79.11 % | 231 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 21 Total Votes: 292
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 18.39 % | 55 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 81.61 % | 244 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 24 Total Votes: 299
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 13.87 % | 19 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 86.13 % | 118 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 10 Total Votes: 137
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 15.38 % | 10 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 84.62 % | 55 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 6 Total Votes: 65
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 16.05 % | 13 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 83.95 % | 68 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 6 Total Votes: 81
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 17.62 % | 37 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.38 % | 173 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 20 Total Votes: 210
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 15.52 % | 43 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 84.48 % | 234 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 25 Total Votes: 277
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 22.03 % | 13 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 77.97 % | 46 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 4 Total Votes: 59
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 25.93 % | 7 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 74.07 % | 20 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 1 Total Votes: 27
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 0.00 % | 0 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 100.00 % | 2 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 0 Total Votes: 2
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 11.30 % | 27 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 88.70 % | 212 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 15 Total Votes: 239
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 18.92 % | 7 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 81.08 % | 30 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 3 Total Votes: 37
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 60.00 % | 3 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 40.00 % | 2 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 1 Total Votes: 5
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 15.63 % | 30 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 84.38 % | 162 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 23 Total Votes: 192
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 15.00 % | 3 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 85.00 % | 17 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 4 Total Votes: 20
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 24.71 % | 21 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 75.29 % | 64 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 1 Total Votes: 85
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 22.35 % | 19 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 77.65 % | 66 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 4 Total Votes: 85
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 18.18 % | 10 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 81.82 % | 45 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 0 Total Votes: 55
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 21.62 % | 24 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 78.38 % | 87 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 8 Total Votes: 111
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 15.38 % | 20 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 84.62 % | 110 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 4 Total Votes: 130
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 19.64 % | 22 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.36 % | 90 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 7 Total Votes: 112
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 7.69 % | 1 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 92.31 % | 12 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 0 Total Votes: 13
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 13.95 % | 41 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 86.05 % | 253 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 26 Total Votes: 294
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 19.80 % | 20 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.20 % | 81 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 10 Total Votes: 101
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 20.96 % | 48 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 79.04 % | 181 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 18 Total Votes: 229
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 19.86 % | 29 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.14 % | 117 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 16 Total Votes: 146
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 0.00 % | 0 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 100.00 % | 3 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 0 Total Votes: 3
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 22.05 % | 43 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 77.95 % | 152 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 16 Total Votes: 195
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 23.55 % | 57 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 76.45 % | 185 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 24 Total Votes: 242
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 16.37 % | 37 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 83.63 % | 189 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 21 Total Votes: 226
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 14.71 % | 15 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 85.29 % | 87 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 9 Total Votes: 102
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 20.87 % | 24 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 79.13 % | 91 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 15 Total Votes: 115
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 12.20 % | 30 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 87.80 % | 216 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 18 Total Votes: 246
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 16.67 % | 4 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 83.33 % | 20 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 4 Total Votes: 24
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 16.85 % | 15 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 83.15 % | 74 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 6 Total Votes: 89
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 16.33 % | 32 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 83.67 % | 164 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 14 Total Votes: 196
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 14.29 % | 21 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 85.71 % | 126 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 12 Total Votes: 147
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 23.23 % | 46 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 76.77 % | 152 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 26 Total Votes: 198
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 22.38 % | 32 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 77.62 % | 111 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 10 Total Votes: 143
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 17.05 % | 37 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.95 % | 180 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 15 Total Votes: 217
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 21.57 % | 33 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 78.43 % | 120 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 16 Total Votes: 153
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 20.69 % | 24 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 79.31 % | 92 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 8 Total Votes: 116
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 15.11 % | 60 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 84.89 % | 337 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 33 Total Votes: 397
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 16.30 % | 52 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 83.70 % | 267 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 27 Total Votes: 319
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 60.00 % | 3 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 40.00 % | 2 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 0 Total Votes: 5
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 15.88 % | 37 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 84.12 % | 196 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 21 Total Votes: 233
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 14.69 % | 42 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 85.31 % | 244 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 17 Total Votes: 286
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 15.91 % | 28 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 84.09 % | 148 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 12 Total Votes: 176
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 19.67 % | 60 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.33 % | 245 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 36 Total Votes: 305
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 8.89 % | 4 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 91.11 % | 41 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 1 Total Votes: 45
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 17.54 % | 30 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.46 % | 141 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 20 Total Votes: 171
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 20.27 % | 15 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 79.73 % | 59 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 5 Total Votes: 74
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 21.48 % | 32 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 78.52 % | 117 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 10 Total Votes: 149
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 27.42 % | 17 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 72.58 % | 45 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 9 Total Votes: 62
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 27.50 % | 11 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 72.50 % | 29 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 2 Total Votes: 40
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 17.36 % | 21 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.64 % | 100 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 7 Total Votes: 121
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 26.23 % | 16 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 73.77 % | 45 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 5 Total Votes: 61
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 0.00 % | 0 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 100.00 % | 1 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 0 Total Votes: 1
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 24.19 % | 15 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 75.81 % | 47 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 4 Total Votes: 62
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 18.75 % | 57 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 81.25 % | 247 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 12 Total Votes: 304
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 19.64 % | 11 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.36 % | 45 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 8 Total Votes: 56
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 20.00 % | 4 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.00 % | 16 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 1 Total Votes: 20
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 40.00 % | 8 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 60.00 % | 12 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 1 Total Votes: 20
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 20.55 % | 15 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 79.45 % | 58 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 9 Total Votes: 73
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 0.00 % | 0 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 100.00 % | 1 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 0 Total Votes: 1
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 14.78 % | 17 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 85.22 % | 98 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 10 Total Votes: 115
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 7.14 % | 1 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 92.86 % | 13 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 0 Total Votes: 14
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 18.75 % | 6 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 81.25 % | 26 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 3 Total Votes: 32
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 18.92 % | 21 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 81.08 % | 90 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 11 Total Votes: 111
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 19.35 % | 6 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.65 % | 25 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 3 Total Votes: 31
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 21.94 % | 52 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 78.06 % | 185 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 9 Total Votes: 237
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 25.00 % | 39 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 75.00 % | 117 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 14 Total Votes: 156
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 27.04 % | 43 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 72.96 % | 116 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 6 Total Votes: 159
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 24.10 % | 20 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 75.90 % | 63 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 11 Total Votes: 83
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 18.83 % | 42 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 81.17 % | 181 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 19 Total Votes: 223
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 18.25 % | 25 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 81.75 % | 112 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 12 Total Votes: 137
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 27.78 % | 15 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 72.22 % | 39 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 5 Total Votes: 54
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 19.18 % | 14 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.82 % | 59 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 5 Total Votes: 73
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 25.32 % | 79 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 74.68 % | 233 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 30 Total Votes: 312
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 16.67 % | 1 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 83.33 % | 5 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 0 Total Votes: 6
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 17.17 % | 40 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.83 % | 193 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 19 Total Votes: 233
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 17.39 % | 32 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.61 % | 152 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 10 Total Votes: 184
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 21.66 % | 34 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 78.34 % | 123 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 8 Total Votes: 157
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 16.42 % | 22 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 83.58 % | 112 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 18 Total Votes: 134
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 17.35 % | 51 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.65 % | 243 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 27 Total Votes: 294
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 28.41 % | 50 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 71.59 % | 126 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 9 Total Votes: 176
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 42.86 % | 3 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 57.14 % | 4 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 0 Total Votes: 7
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 24.92 % | 79 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 75.08 % | 238 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 36 Total Votes: 317
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 23.30 % | 48 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 76.70 % | 158 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 16 Total Votes: 206
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 22.41 % | 13 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 77.59 % | 45 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 7 Total Votes: 58
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 23.56 % | 45 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 76.44 % | 146 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 19 Total Votes: 191
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 25.91 % | 85 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 74.09 % | 243 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 33 Total Votes: 328
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 21.29 % | 76 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 78.71 % | 281 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 29 Total Votes: 357
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 38.00 % | 19 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 62.00 % | 31 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 7 Total Votes: 50
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 21.83 % | 43 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 78.17 % | 154 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 26 Total Votes: 197
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 23.46 % | 57 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 76.54 % | 186 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 19 Total Votes: 243
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 22.61 % | 71 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 77.39 % | 243 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 27 Total Votes: 314
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 14.81 % | 4 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 85.19 % | 23 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 0 Total Votes: 27
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 20.60 % | 48 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 79.40 % | 185 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 26 Total Votes: 233
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 19.16 % | 41 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.84 % | 173 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 19 Total Votes: 214
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 16.38 % | 19 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 83.62 % | 97 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 2 Total Votes: 116
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 21.43 % | 3 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 78.57 % | 11 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 1 Total Votes: 14
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 17.99 % | 25 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.01 % | 114 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 5 Total Votes: 139
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 19.28 % | 16 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.72 % | 67 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 8 Total Votes: 83
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 0.00 % | 0 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 100.00 % | 30 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 1 Total Votes: 30
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 12.50 % | 12 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 87.50 % | 84 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 9 Total Votes: 96
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 26.76 % | 19 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 73.24 % | 52 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 8 Total Votes: 71
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 0.00 % | 0 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 100.00 % | 5 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 0 Total Votes: 5
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 5.56 % | 3 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 94.44 % | 51 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 6 Total Votes: 54
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 16.34 % | 25 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 83.66 % | 128 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 12 Total Votes: 153
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 21.74 % | 10 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 78.26 % | 36 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 5 Total Votes: 46
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 15.88 % | 37 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 84.12 % | 196 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 18 Total Votes: 233
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 15.87 % | 40 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 84.13 % | 212 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 25 Total Votes: 252
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 38.46 % | 5 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 61.54 % | 8 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 2 Total Votes: 13
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 19.70 % | 13 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.30 % | 53 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 4 Total Votes: 66
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 22.29 % | 37 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 77.71 % | 129 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 19 Total Votes: 166
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 18.35 % | 29 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 81.65 % | 129 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 11 Total Votes: 158
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 18.00 % | 27 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.00 % | 123 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 12 Total Votes: 150
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 10.53 % | 2 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 89.47 % | 17 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 4 Total Votes: 19
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 19.53 % | 66 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.47 % | 272 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 23 Total Votes: 338
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 18.52 % | 5 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 81.48 % | 22 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 2 Total Votes: 27
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 11.11 % | 4 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 88.89 % | 32 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 2 Total Votes: 36
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 20.12 % | 67 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 79.88 % | 266 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 26 Total Votes: 333
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 15.15 % | 15 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 84.85 % | 84 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 9 Total Votes: 99
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 17.31 % | 9 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.69 % | 43 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 1 Total Votes: 52
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 16.46 % | 27 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 83.54 % | 137 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 12 Total Votes: 164
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 9.09 % | 1 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 90.91 % | 10 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 0 Total Votes: 11
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 50.00 % | 8 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 50.00 % | 8 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 3 Total Votes: 16
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 25.58 % | 11 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 74.42 % | 32 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 2 Total Votes: 43
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 19.39 % | 32 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.61 % | 133 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 18 Total Votes: 165
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 22.27 % | 51 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 77.73 % | 178 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 17 Total Votes: 229
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 22.90 % | 30 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 77.10 % | 101 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 5 Total Votes: 131
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 21.34 % | 35 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 78.66 % | 129 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 10 Total Votes: 164
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 11.11 % | 1 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 88.89 % | 8 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 0 Total Votes: 9
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 17.91 % | 36 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 82.09 % | 165 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 15 Total Votes: 201
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 25.23 % | 55 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 74.77 % | 163 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 19 Total Votes: 218
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 19.88 % | 66 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 80.12 % | 266 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 28 Total Votes: 332
Candidate/Choice | Graph | Pct | Votes | Info |
Ed Ireson | | 20.53 % | 54 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Susan Hays | | 79.47 % | 209 | ![Vote Breakdown Vote Breakdown](images/info-button.png) |
Over Votes: 0 Under Votes: 19 Total Votes: 263
Data Last Updated: 6/6/2022 9:04:40 AM
Page Loaded on: 9/7/2024 7:26:25 PM